Google is acquiring companies like I acquire candy on Halloween.  This raises some big questions like; is Google getting too big for itself?  They seem to be on a path to become another Microsoft or Apple, yea that big!  Let’s take a look at their latest reason to salivate, Yelp!

Yelp! is a community of restaurant/food fanatics who upload user reviews of eateries and restaurants.  From Bob’s Steaks just down the road to the most classy restaurants in New York City.

• Larry Dignan at ZDNet. Dignan predicts a dark scenario if the deal goes through: “See where this is going? Google is your friendly neighborhood local business gatekeeper. Google is already the gatekeeper for the big guys. The Google is a local content Borg. Resistance is futile. So is innovation. Any threat these days gets acquired.”

Larry brings up a valid point.  Google is becoming such a dominant force could it stifle innovation in the areas they are involved in?  Any start-up with any promise that could run with the big boys gets sucked up and purchased by Google.  Does this sound familiar?  Microsoft anyone?

David Coursey of PC World even published an article inserting the idea of Apple and Microsoft teaming up to take on Google.  I’m not the only one seeing the GOOG as a threat, am I?

I will be the first to admit I love Google.  They are one of the biggest and best tech companies in the world bar none. Their innovation, products, business ideals are all fantastic.  I use many Google products including, search, e-mail, maps, docs, wave, voice etc.  You name it, I probably use it.

Do we blame Google for their dominance and great business sense to this point?  Or do we blame everyone else who can’t step up and compete with Google?  I’m not sure which way the tide would go on that question.

Everyone is worried about the H1N1 flu this season.  This already in addition to the regular flu strain that kills thousands every year.  Google developed this trending product to track the spread of flu worldwide.

We have found a close relationship between how many people search for flu-related topics and how many people actually have flu symptoms. Of course, not every person who searches for “flu” is actually sick, but a pattern emerges when all the flu-related search queries are added together. We compared our query counts with traditional flu surveillance systems and found that many search queries tend to be popular exactly when flu season is happening. By counting how often we see these search queries, we can estimate how much flu is circulating in different countries and regions around the world. — Google Flu Trends

How accurate is it?  Good question.  I’ll let this graphic speak for itself.

This should be an interesting year to track the flu.  It is worth a bookmark in your browser.

Check out Google Flu Trends

Securing wireless networks has been a headache for broadband users for years now.  I wanted to write a short blog on how the average home user or small business can secure their wireless network and keep moochers and even more malicious users at bay.

Your Not Secure Out Of The Gate

Most users think just having a router is an automatic shield after listening to various media stories praise routers for their firewall abilities.  This is not the case.  Most routers you purchase at your local electronics store (Best Buy, Wal-Mart etc.) is not secure when you first plug it in. Routers are normally pre-configured to be open wireless access points.  This means anyone within its range will be able to use your connection, no questions asked.  This is done to make setup easy and compatible with most operating systems.  The only problem is it leaves your network open to attack.

The very first thing you’ll want to is login to your router’s administration panel.  This is done by typing in a 192.168.x.x address into your browsers address bar.  The actual number varies by router manufacturer, look in your user guide or online to find the local IP address for your router.  Linksys for example is 192.168.1.1.  The manufacturer sets very easy non-secure passwords.  These are easily found online as well as in your user guide and if left unchanged will make your network exceptionally vulnerable.  You’ll want to change the password to your router right away.  Make sure it is a secure password of at least six characters and preferably with upper and lowercase letters and numbers.

Bad Advice From GeekSquad

Local sales associates at places like Best Buy are often clueless on network security and sometimes offer up misleading advice.  Here are some steps that aren’t harmful, but mostly just a waste of time because they don’t secure your network.

• Turning off your SSID broadcast. - The SSID (Service Set Identifier) is an identifier broadcast by a wireless router.  You might know this as your network name.  Most routers default SSID broadcast is the manufacturers name (linksys, netgear etc.)  Turning this off does nothing to protect your network.  With the proper software, a malicious user could easily spot your networks presence even with the SSID off.  It is a false sense of security.   Changing the network name won’t make you more secure either, though I would recommend doing it.  Just make sure you SSID isn’t identifiable making it easy for outside users to know where the network is located (i.e. last name, home address are all no no’s)
• Turning DHCP Off - This in theory is a good idea but really doesn’t make you more secure.  It is easy to detect the method in which ip addresses are being assigned and make a request matching that method.
• Filtering MAC Addresses – Filtering MAC addresses is a good practice to get into, but for most households and businesses it causes more headache than what it’s worth.  For homes with many devices on the network like game systems, multiple computers and cell phones, filtering MAC addresses simply isn’t practical.  That being said, a malicious user with easily attainable monitoring software can replicate a MAC address and still penetrate your network.  This method has some value for keeping the average user off the network but will crumble with ease against advanced computer users.

What You Should Do

The easiest thing you can do to secure your network is protect your wireless access point with encryption.  There are two different kinds of encryption you can use.  One is known as Wired Equivalent Privacy or WEP. This encryption is better than nothing but it does have a huge problem.

Beginning in 2001, several serious weaknesses were identified by cryptanalysts with the result that today a WEP connection can be cracked with readily available software found online within minutes. — Source:  Wikipedia

WEP can be easily cracked within minutes therefore it should not be your first choice, though it is better than having no encryption at all.  It will keep your pesky neighbors with no computer skills from using your bandwidth, but even the most novice 13 year-old could brute force their way into your network.  You want something with a little more ‘umph’.

You will want to use Wifi Protected Access, otherwise known as WPA,  for your wireless encryption.  WPA was designed after flaws were discovered in WEP that led to its demise.  Recently, researchers have found a way to crack WPA-TKIP connections, though it is still tougher than cracking WEP.  Since this has happened, you’ll want to make sure your using WPA-AES encryption to remain secure.  AES stands for Advanced Encryption Standard and the encryption contains three block ciphers.  It has been adopted by the U.S. government as their standard for encrypting sensitive networks and has yet to be cracked.

WPA2 is an even newer advance in WiFi network security.  If you have an older router or a computer older than 3 years old you may have compatibility issues.  For less headaches and still secure network, stick with WPA-AES unless you have all ‘newer’ hardware.

Conclusion

The simplest thing you can do to protect your wireless network is still encrypting it.  There is no need to cause yourself more trouble by turning off DHCP or hiding the SSID identifier. It will only give you headaches and nightmares down the road.  Most need for securing your WiFi comes from nosey neighbors or passer-by’s looking to score free Internet.  They don’t want to steal your credit card info or read your e-mails bur just score free interwebs. However, there are individuals who go around looking for easy targets to steal sensitive information from.

I found this from my girl Julia Roy.  I love these videos because they are so mind provoking and really make you think on a macro level.

I found these particuarly interesting:

By 2010 Gen Y will outnumber Baby Boomers.
This illustrates the shift occuring in our society right now in the U.S.  —  The older generations are falling out of power in business and society and Gen Y is taking over!

Social Media has overtaken porn as the #1 activity on the Web.
Didn’t think I’d ever see this happen!

1 in 6 higher education students are enrolled in online curriculum.
I am included in this 1 in 6 students.  UW-Stout is a leader in online curriculum.  In fact, most classes I take in a year are online.

You see an old high school friend while shopping for your next pair of underwear.  You stop briefly to catch-up on ‘old times’ only to find it’s almost like you never were apart.  Sherri had a baby and John just had a killer bachelor party, yadda yadda yadda.  This phenomenon is known as ‘ambient awareness’.  Platforms like Facebook and Twitter have made following your friends, families and co-workers daily lives effortless.

Many non-early adopters ask, why do I care that Matt ate toast this morning or thinks that AT&T is an epic failure as a wireless provider?  With occasional browsing the updates seem really boring, perhaps even absurd to even waste time reading.  Keep following those status updates and tweets, soon a digital picture begins to emerge in your head.  You begin to tune into the flow of your friends daily lives and know their day-to-day triumphs and tribulations.  This is known as digital intimacy.

Digital intimacy is increasing on a monthly basis with the evolution of ‘real-time’ platforms.  Thousands of users squawked when Facebook updated to their freshly designed home page with information popping up in their users feeds faster than ever before.  After a few months most adjusted to the new speed of information and the ground swell subsided.

So with this new ambient awareness of your network, you will find yourself feeling strangely close to your friends even though you rarely see them.  When you do stumble across them you pick up your conversation where it left off online.  This is not an unproven theory, I catch myself doing it all the time.  The more I scan my networks the closer I feel digitally to my friends.  But sometimes too much digital digestion can be a bit stressful.

This stress has led to many digital mavens to start adopting convergence tools like FriendFeed or simply skimming on the platforms they currently use when they have ample time.

Users who create more content are much more likely to have more digital visibility and are also more likely to have digital awareness of their network.  Content creates conversation and will foster more time spent digesting and engaging in the conversation.  This closeness drawn from conversation and interaction will foster more digital awareness of their network, especially those who engage with that users content.

That begs the question, are you in the conversation?

So many of us do it daily, but hardly anyone does it efficiently.  E-mail has rapidly become as important as checking your physical snail mail box outside your home.  Nothing annoys me more than having to wait more than 24-48 hours for an e-mail response unless they have auto-reply turned on notifying you otherwise.  My gripe to people I know who do that is, “would you check your physical mailbox every three or four days?”  They always reply with the common answer, no.

Here are some guidelines for effective e-mail

• Don’t Ramble! -  When people sit down to check their e-mail they often have lots of messages and little time.  Don’t tell your life story only to get to the point in the very last sentence.  KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) often works well for e-mail.  No more than five sentences, that’s it!
• Be Careful With E-Mail Directories and pre-defined mailing lists - I’ve seen people I know make this terrible mistake.  When loading up multiple recipients or using a pre-defined mailing list make sure you know who it’s going to!  Double check and re-check the recipients you’ve selected or know who the mailing list contains.  You could send information and have it seen by users who you definitely don’t want seeing it.
• Don’t E-Mail Angry - Sometimes you will receive a message that angers you or maybe your upset for outside reasons.  Never, ever send an e-mail while angry.  Just leave it sit till the next day and approach your e-mail with a calm and collected mood.
• Respect Privacy – I’m not terribly strong on this point, but some people are really hypersensitive about their e-mail address.  I am personally not one of these people.  When sending an e-mail to a group of people consider using the BCC (Blind Carbon Copy) option.  This will mask everyone who receives the message so none of your recipients know who else received the message.
• Have A Good Signature - Signature are important and everyone should have one.  Often times they are over done and sometimes down right distracting.  Don’t use photos in your signature as it will increase the likelihood of being caught by a spam filter.  Don’t put any kind of quotes in your e-mail, they could end being offensive or confusing to your recipient.  Use eight lines to compose your signature, anything more is just too much.  Only include what you want recipients to know!  I know it is kind of obvious but if you don’t want business calls at home, don’t include your home phone number.  Lastly don’t get flashy and fancy, keep it simple.  Your not designing a poster, use easy to read fonts.
• Check It Often - As I described above, nothing gets under my skin more when someone does not check their e-mail daily or respond in a timely matter.  Check your e-mail at the bare minimum once a day, I recommend checking it twice a day.  Don’t just read, respond!   Techno geeks like myself have e-mail on constantly with push notifications to our mobile devices.  When you send me an e-mail I get it within a minute or two.  If it is critical i’ll respond within minutes, not days.  You wouldn’t let your physical mailbox outside your home go unchecked for days, would you?
• Don’t Use HTML - Don’t use HTML to link to your website or blog or anywhere else on the web.  (i.e. “My Website”)  Actually spell out the address. (i.e. http://www.techization.com)  You never know what kind of e-mail client the recipient is using and how it could display or not display your address.  This leads to a distraction within the message and could result in a lost opportunity if your link doesn’t work.

And for goodness sakes spell check before you send!

Did I forget one of your e-mail etiquette pet peeves?  Have another good point?  Leave a comment below!

I have spent the last week in the Chicago metro area.  From the northwest suburbs of Schaumburg and Elk Grove Village to Grant Park on the Lake Michigan shoreline downtown.  This urban immersion has provided some valuable lessons.

• iPhone battery life is kind of bad!

Living in the isolated and desolate state known as Wisconsin, it is not often my iPhone use is ‘heavy’.  I know most places I go so I don’t use battery-sucking GPS Google maps, I know the good places to eat so no need for Yelp. No long commutes to listen to my iPod.  I thought my iPhone battery life was ‘okay’ but certainly could be better.  I would plug it in nightly with 30%-40% of battery life remaining after light to moderate use.  Being in Chicago I had to consciously think, ‘do I really need to look this up or should I save my battery?’  Leaving for downtown in late morning my battery would dead by 6 or 7 p.m.  Between Twitter, Google Maps (w/ GPS), Yelp! (to eat), Photos (snap, snap!) and iPod (1 hr commute in downtown via train), my battery was taking a real pounding.

• The AT&T network really does suck!

You’ve read all the grumblings from other metros, New York, San Fran, L.A. and Miami.  AT&T’s network is terrible.  Do we need to rehash the SXSW incident where all the tech geeks converging caused the AT&T network to crash with the convention in town?  I think not.  I use the SpeedTest.net app on my iPhone to measure bandwidth.  I only got one good result of 2.3 mbps down and 280 kbps up.  That was in the fringe suburbs of the metro though.  When downtown I was getting varying results between 250kbps-700kbps down and 40kbps-170kbps up.  Needless to say I wasn’t very impressed.  Yes the speed varied with the time of day, but overall I was unimpressed with the networks ability to handle the data. That is a teaser for my next point!

• Digital spread is thick in metropolitan areas.

I had a realization moment while riding the Metra train back to Elk Grove Village this afternoon during rush hour.  I was crammed like sardines with business professionals commuting home from work.  Everyone around me had ear phones in and either an iPhone or MP3 player in their hands.  With about 50-60 people in my car, well over 75% were holding a portable media device.  The other 25% were reading the paper, book or using their laptop.  During down time, consumers of digital media simply ‘graze’ news, tweets, music, podcasts etc. as they cruise their way to home or work.  Many companies want to know how to reach a large mass on social media platforms like Twitter.  The truth is because so much information fly’s through our networks, we can’t take it all in.  If you tried, you’d burn out before you knew what hit you.  Many are ‘grazing’.  During proper times they digest what is active in their network at that time and simply turn it off when they need to.  I would argue some of the best times to reach those in your network is commute times and lunch.  However, peak times to reach your network varies with your networks ‘lifestyle’.

The University of Wisconsin – Stout, Wisconsin’s Polytechnic University is always looking for ways to practically implement technology to benefit their students.  Earlier this month I suggested a new way to use the micro-blogging service Twitter in the classroom to university administrators.  As of this summer, our communications office used Twitter as a broadcast platform to announce news and at least one professor in the English department used Twitter in the classroom to communicate with her students.  The idea I proposed to administrators was a bit more engaging than any current use of Twitter on campus.

Why use Twitter as a passive form of micro-emailing like leaving DM’s for professors when it can be a real-time virtual platform.  I suggested that professors who have appropriate courses should display Twitter on the projector screens in the front of the classroom.  With third-party software like Tweetdeck the professor can follow a custom hashtag for her class and have it auto-refresh at pre-determined intervals.  This allows for a virtual conversation to take place between students as the professor lectures on a topic.

The professor can skim over the ongoing Twitter conversation during his or her lecture and comment on what students have been saying, this will deepen the lecture and make it more personable to the ‘pulse of the students’ who are taking it in.  Giving every student a digital voice will cater to shy students who have things they’d like to say, but don’t out of fear of embarrassment.

Once out of the classroom, the student will be able to go back and re-read comments from any lecture. Re-reading his own tweets and those of his peers will help during weekly assignments and provide a platform for out of class discussion.

Even if a professor is ill or out of town, they can login to Twitter and watch their students comment and discuss that day’s lecture and even jump in the conversation while not present.

Twitter is a valuable communication tool but evolution of ‘real-time’ communication will continue well beyond the walls of Twitter, most notably with Google Wave in the next year or so.  This idea is certainly an experimental one with many variables that can lead towards success or failure of its use.  Some are obvious yet some are unforeseen.  It is my hope that professors at UW-Stout will begin to utilize this means of communicating to aid learning and engagement.

Micro-bloggers and Tweeters worldwide began criticizing CNN for not covering the Tehran Protests.  CNN even had the story in the middle of their ‘Top Stories’ section, no where near the virtual headline like BBC News did.  This situation leaves many questions, including why CNN felt this massive story was unimportant.  I’m not about to start any conspiracy theories but I’ll be interested reading blogs in the coming days about the speculation.  But this debacle shows a very interesting digital perspective.  See this graphic of top news sites designed by Michael Pinto.

The #cnnfail hashtag started and really gained some steam as it was trending for hours over the weekend.  However, that momentum has fallen over the last 24 hours as CNN has responded to their viewers anger by devoting day-long coverage to the ‘breaking news’.

Hashtag decline as CNN responds to viewer anger

Viewers have grown to have expectations for CNN when it comes to breaking news.  I feel if this would have happened with Fox News or any other news outlet,  no one really would have cared all that much.  This bodes well for CNN and their campaign to brand themselves as a leader in breaking news and being an early adopter with new technologies.  However, this backfired on them this weekend.  When CNN didn’t deliver on expectations as they drowned the Iran protest story with Letterman vs. Palin, their loyal viewers got their news from different unfiltered sources online like Twitter itself and lashed out at the media giant for their lack of coverage.   Iran has blocked access to social networking sites, text messaging and even jamming satellite signals for T.V. reporters.  Tech savvy students have found ways around the block Internet sites and have managed to leak out information from the front lines.  This website shows graphic photos of students who were under attack at Tehran University.  Exactly the kind of information the Iranian government wants censored from the global community.

Twitter can not only serve as a platform to inform the entire world about the Tehran University attacks, it can also swing corporate media giants to pay attention.